<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 视频: KDE 4.2 - KWin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html</link>
	<description>LinuxTOY 是一个致力于提供 Linux 相关资讯的专题站点。如果您发现了好用好玩的 Linux 东东并愿意发扬自由、分享的精神，可以点击顶部导航 Contact 按钮进行投稿。</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: freedrive</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100342</link>
		<dc:creator>freedrive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;foolz，并不是大家都不明白桌面是拿来工作的因而需要稳定性和可用性，关键是在于开发开源软件的都是志愿者，他们大多数只是因为兴趣而工作，所以总是开发这些eye candy的东西而不愿意在稳定性和可用性上多下功夫就不奇怪了，毕竟改进稳定性和可用性以及臭虫修复这些工作是极其枯燥无味的。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>foolz，并不是大家都不明白桌面是拿来工作的因而需要稳定性和可用性，关键是在于开发开源软件的都是志愿者，他们大多数只是因为兴趣而工作，所以总是开发这些eye candy的东西而不愿意在稳定性和可用性上多下功夫就不奇怪了，毕竟改进稳定性和可用性以及臭虫修复这些工作是极其枯燥无味的。</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100295</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;我用的是Gnome，泪奔 。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我用的是Gnome，泪奔 。</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolz</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100202</link>
		<dc:creator>foolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100202</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;KDE should take case of the basic GUI first. I mean, clearly, the usability and flexibility are not impressive at all. Just keep things simple, keep add eye candy function will just make KDE4 seem like a never finish product. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Out of all those, only three of them are really useful: switch, corners desktop, and windows preview. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally, I really think, the Art in KDE4 not as professional as it can be. Like the menu is deep black, and the windows and menu are light gray? And one is glassy while the other is toward to 2D flat. I mean either one can look good, but having both in the same interface, just feel weird. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a conclusion, I really love cool effect. and sometime, they can be really useful. However, the first things should be think about is the usability and flexibility. It is totally fine to have 2% of your system recourse to run a cool effect desktop (assuming you have a 2GB ram system.) Today's computer can easier have 6 or 8 GB installed. But after all, A GUI should be something to help get job done faster, not something to play with. It can be fun too, but it shouldn't be the primary sell point.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KDE should take case of the basic GUI first. I mean, clearly, the usability and flexibility are not impressive at all. Just keep things simple, keep add eye candy function will just make KDE4 seem like a never finish product. </p>

<p>Out of all those, only three of them are really useful: switch, corners desktop, and windows preview. </p>

<p>Personally, I really think, the Art in KDE4 not as professional as it can be. Like the menu is deep black, and the windows and menu are light gray? And one is glassy while the other is toward to 2D flat. I mean either one can look good, but having both in the same interface, just feel weird. </p>

<p>As a conclusion, I really love cool effect. and sometime, they can be really useful. However, the first things should be think about is the usability and flexibility. It is totally fine to have 2% of your system recourse to run a cool effect desktop (assuming you have a 2GB ram system.) Today's computer can easier have 6 or 8 GB installed. But after all, A GUI should be something to help get job done faster, not something to play with. It can be fun too, but it shouldn't be the primary sell point.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yang</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100187</link>
		<dc:creator>yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100187</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;我怎么特别讨厌这种花里胡哨的东东了？
尽量模仿mac，却只是做到了外表，没有做到实在点。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我怎么特别讨厌这种花里胡哨的东东了？
尽量模仿mac，却只是做到了外表，没有做到实在点。</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lun</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100183</link>
		<dc:creator>lun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100183</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;我的Kde 4，在打出K菜单时不花屏就好了。&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我的Kde 4，在打出K菜单时不花屏就好了。</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100176</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100176</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Chung
看了高清的视频，明白了，原先是被这些Compiz中都有的特效误导了。确实是KDE特效，大家鄙视我吧...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;最后一次用KDE是Fedora Core 1时代，那时候没有Compiz这东西...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chung
看了高清的视频，明白了，原先是被这些Compiz中都有的特效误导了。确实是KDE特效，大家鄙视我吧...</p>

<p>最后一次用KDE是Fedora Core 1时代，那时候没有Compiz这东西...</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meto</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100164</link>
		<dc:creator>meto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100164</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@墨尔本的云 KDE4.2beta1的时候已经可以自定义屏幕四个角触发事件了n_n&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@墨尔本的云 KDE4.2beta1的时候已经可以自定义屏幕四个角触发事件了n_n</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zerg</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100154</link>
		<dc:creator>zerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;感觉可以给我等普通小白用了~~~~~~&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Crash一般几个钟一次，壁纸 任务栏都没有问题，不过打开菜单 托盘区经常花屏&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>感觉可以给我等普通小白用了~~~~~~</p>

<p>Crash一般几个钟一次，壁纸 任务栏都没有问题，不过打开菜单 托盘区经常花屏</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Elf</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100149</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Elf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href="#comment-100133" rel="nofollow"&gt;kidfruit&lt;/a&gt;: 
严重同意！尤其是界面协调感！&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-100133" rel="nofollow">kidfruit</a>: 
严重同意！尤其是界面协调感！</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chung</title>
		<link>http://linuxtoy.org/archives/kde-42-kwin-videos.html#comment-100147</link>
		<dc:creator>Chung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxtoy.org/?p=2696#comment-100147</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href="#comment-100128" rel="nofollow"&gt;Terry&lt;/a&gt;:  很怀疑你有没有看文章的内容.或是根本不了解.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Compiz是有这种效果.但不代表其它程序搞不出这种效果.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-100128" rel="nofollow">Terry</a>:  很怀疑你有没有看文章的内容.或是根本不了解.</p>

<p>Compiz是有这种效果.但不代表其它程序搞不出这种效果.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

